I have no doubt that morale is low and depression high among Winnipeg police officers. They are called into situations of crisis and violence and in many situations they called when the crisis and violence has already occurred, that is, there is little for them to do. It seems that what made this manageable even if difficult was a sense of public value, that they were honored for the difficult situations they were placed in. In August of 2020 Winnipeg Police Chief Danny Smyth attempted to address what he called a ‘breach of the social contract’, namely that the police would uphold their responsibilities and in turn be honoured appropriately. Smyth goes on to name the current ‘woke’ culture that is challenging the necessity of policing as a “steady and constant drumbeat of criticism [that] is taking a toll on the well-being of the women and men who dedicate themselves to serving our community.”[1]
In months we would hear more about low morale and even the suicide an officer. Here again, citizens engaged critical approaches to policing are called out. Chair of the Winnipeg Police Board Markus Chambers is quoted as saying, “There are some people who focus on abolishing police, and simply do not recognize the services… are provided by humans who are also subject to emotion and feeling. We can agree to disagree about funding or defunding, but should not de-value the work that officers do as they literally put their lives on the line.”[2] This critical culture is named explicitly in the obituary of the officer who died by suicide stating, “Sadly the light in his eyes began to dim in latter months as he became increasingly troubled with anti-police protests, campaigns, growing public hatred and cynicism toward police officers.”[3]
In the latest insight into current police culture in Winnipeg a column was written by a recently retired police officer. This input attempts to offer some insight into the lived experience of facing difficult and tragic situations in which one has little time to reflect on actions. We are told that they are in situations in which it is impossible for race to factor into their split second decision and in turn must bear the judgment of a race sensitive culture in which “Had I shot him . . . the purple community and their supporters would undoubtedly have vilified me for shooting a purple person just because he was purple. Circumstances be damned — I’m a racist.” Again in the end there is a naming of rising culture critical of policing of which “the magnitude of this unfettered malevolence directed at police lately is disarming.”[4] That race is viewed as some arbitrary, ahistorical and superficial distinction should make us wonder about what sort of training police do fact in receive. I want, however, to focus on the closing remarks regarding malevolence.
In the last year I have become increasingly invested in understanding and promoting the idea of defunding and abolishing the police. I have been a part of events which, it is true, expressed deep animosity and ‘malevolence’ towards the police. I would like to offer a few thoughts which attempt to take seriously the present experience of individual Winnipeg police officers within a commitment to defunding the police.
Anecdotally when I was in my late teens and early twenties I considered RCMP training. I had no clear career aspirations and I intuitively felt like the RCMP was an honorable and moral expression in society. Had a few circumstances shifted there is no reason I would not have pursued that opportunity. All this to say I understand at least one impulse towards policing. I expect many police officers both entered into and have attempted to carry out their work from a desire literally to ‘serve and protect’. So why not support them? Isn’t the work of serving and protecting still honorable?
While I did not go into policing I did enter another fraught profession, namely Christian ministry. Like policing Christianity has historically communicated its work as benevolent and beneficial to society. And like policing Christianity has had staunch critics who have called for Christianity’s decolonization and some instances outright abolition. For years I was defensive of such criticisms responding with claims that such criticisms were limited or part of a misunderstanding. In time though I learned more about why people criticized Christianity and began to see for myself how the church functioned harmfully. I found both particular harms that could perhaps be dismissed as ‘bad apples’ but I also began to see deep structural problems in how Christianity positions itself as possessing the truth and how that impacts its encounter with non-Christians. So I wrestled with these questions, for years (and still do). There were times that I had to give myself the option of leaving the church if I felt it was too compromised for what I wanted to live and work for. In the end I stayed but in staying I occupied a different place and expression in the church than which I began.
My investment, which as a Christian I come to speak of as ‘gospel’, is in supporting and valuing expressions of peace and just. This is different than being invested in the church or in Christianity. This allows me to be critical where criticism is warranted and be supportive for support is required. This is not a perfect response and I can accept imperfections in life but what I wonder is whether anything like this is even possible within policing.
With only the slimmest acknowledgement of anything like racism as a problem we have witnessed the spokespeople for the Winnipeg Police double down on defending their profession and attacking voluntary activists as literally causing their depression and suicide. Is there any freedom to express deep concerns over systemic abuses? Is there any ability to accept the role of policing in relation to issues of securing wealth and punishing poverty? Can there be calls from within the force that acknowledge that the authorization and implementation of lethal force is hardly ever required for serving the public as well as acknowledging that the threat of such force actually risks escalating a situation towards such ends? Or to put it in a way that I had to for myself. What are you invested in? Are you invested in the wellbeing of those you are called to serve or are you invested in the maintenance of your institution?
Calls to defund the police are only experienced as attacks when you are more invested in the institution of policing than in the wellbeing of the community. I understand that the personal struggle of facing criticism and natural response of defensiveness. As a pastor I am open to speaking anyone about their experiences in this area. But truly this becomes a question of maturity. If someone is not yet able to face and meaningfully engage such criticism than perhaps they are, at the very least, not mature enough to carry a gun.
If indeed there is no space to explore the harmfulness of policing by police officers themselves then there is little hope either for substantive change or for improved wellbeing of individual officers becoming yet another way in which the structure of policing is inadequate to pursuing peace and wellbeing in our city.
[1] https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/the-lamentable-erosion-of-a-social-contract-572049092.html
[2] https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/depression-anxiety-widespread-in-city-police-force-2013-survey-found-573950892.html
[3] https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/after-tragedy-time-to-reconsider-issues-573930392.html
[4] https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/the-view-from-behind-the-badge-574078452.html